If taking everything into account from LSE profiles, keeping the IE definitions in mind, then isn't that too vague again for him?Īnyway. Also, that phenomenon I mention applies to the entire profile not just to a few lines taken here and there from it. But this for me only happens if I also keep the IE definitions in mind to give the right context to the type description. I did wonder before if that's an indicator of anything when I notice the same thing about trying to apply a profile to someone. I do find it interesting what you said about the IEE profile being more "vague" when trying to apply it to him. So this is the Forer effect at play here, with those generalizations. This literally does not fit LSE any more than *any* other type. And only vague general phrasings, like, having a temper in arguments, then being a fun and friendly guy who works hard on what he wants to work on and who tries to be manly enough while wanting a purpose to his life and finds some of the laws important. I could not quote the whole thing with my explanations because it would be too long of a post & would take too much time You quoted very few parts of the LSE profile. It explains both his faults and his strengths. The IEE profile does not fit much and seems a bit vague (like, if he were that type, it'd be an unusual case of one), whereas the LSE profile is almost a perfect representation of his personality (with how his friends describe him and his past and present trends of behavior), word for word. Compare the LSE profile by Gulenko to the IEE one for instance. I don't think the similarities are a case of the Forer effect here. Plus, on a completely superficial level, his smile reminds me so much of my EIE friend (who is otherwise nothing like this douche : ). I get more of a naturally quirky relaxed feeling from IEE's, not exactly this: Even when he's goofing around his expressions are calculated and collected - too much for Fi creatives imo. Probabably that I can't detect Fi in his facial expressions or persona. I think Onision is ENFx, but although I understand the typing, something is bothering me about IEE. she almost always has a big smile on her face, and does these big reactive facial expressions when she has heard something funny, weird or disturbing, etc.Hmmm, many LSE's I've known are emotive in a way that they are very smiley and laugh a lot (ESE seeming), and in those cases I agree their Fe at first glance does come off as stronger than Fe-creatives and even EIE-Ni's (because it's more of the cheesy American variety ), but I've never seen expressions like these from them: Oh and don't be side tracked that just because he looks emo it doesn't mean that he isn't a nice person or isn't smart - he really is.LSE's can be very facially emotive (Fe role & extroversion).ĭirector Abbie for instance (I have met her in person and Skyped with her many times) is a lot more facially emotive than I am, and I am Fe creative. Wow he has a nice jawline, cheekbones, gorgeous eyes, awesome hair, amazing piercings, beautiful face. You're the only person that can set that limitation.' 'There's absolutely no one in the world that can tell you can't do something. Unless you can be Batman - always be Batman.' - Pretty darn obvious that Andy's obsessed with Batman. ' Stand up for what you believe in even if it means standing up alone.' ' Life gives you enough scars, you don't need to manufacture your own.' Just gonna add some quotes from the guy himself : Don't try to deny it because you know that Andy Biersack is just too beautiful to be human. You don't really have a choice because what's not perfect about the guy above my text. OK just remember even if you're a straight guy you can still love Andy Biersack.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |